4.5 Review

Precision medicine in multiple sclerosis: biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 254-262

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000336

关键词

biomarkers; MRI; multiple sclerosis; precision medicine

资金

  1. 'Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria' (FIS), Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain
  2. Ajuts per donar Suport als Grups de Recerca de Catalunya - 'Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca' (AGAUR), Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This article highlights recent studies on MRI and body fluid molecular biomarkers with potential implications in diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Recent findings In the MS diagnostic process, a reappraisal of well known MRI findings, including symptomatic and spinal cord lesions, and incorporation of newer, more specific, features of MS lesions, such as detection of central veins, are in a testing phase aiming to increase diagnostic accuracy. Lesion counts on T2-weighted scans and gadolinium uptake on postcontrast T1-weighted scans are well established prognostic brain MRI biomarkers. Evidences supporting the implementation of brain volume measures for disease and treatment monitoring are increasing, maybe within a 'zero tolerance' scheme in the overarching no evidence of disease activity concept. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chitinase 3-like 1 and the light subunit of neurofilaments are consolidating their prognostic role in patients with clinically isolated syndrome. Blood CD62L and CSF IgM oligoclonal bands may become clinically useful biomarkers for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk stratification in MS patients treated with natalizumab. Summary Although more studies are needed, current and emerging imaging and molecular biomarkers in MS may contribute to outline the concept of precision medicine in MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据