4.5 Article

Comparison of labour and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used epidural analgesia in labour and those who did not: A prospective cohort study

期刊

WOMEN AND BIRTH
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 E435-E441

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.001

关键词

Analgesia; Epidural; Breast feeding; Childbirth; Cohort studies; Pain management

资金

  1. Health Research Board (HRB) Ireland [HPF/2011/18, HRA_HSR/2012/28]
  2. HRB Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement (ICE) [ICE-2015-1019]
  3. Health Research Board (HRB) [ICE-2015-1019, HPF-2011-18, HRA-HSR-2012-28] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared labor and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used and did not use intrapartum epidural analgesia, finding that women using epidural analgesia required more medical interventions during labor and had a decreased likelihood of breastfeeding afterwards. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in neonatal outcomes.
Objective: To compare labour and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used versus did not use intrapartum epidural analgesia. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Two maternity hospitals in Ireland. Population: A total of 1221 nulliparous women who gave birth vaginally or by emergency caesarean section. Methods: Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse categorical outcomes, with results presented as ratios of relative risks (RRR). For dichotomous outcomes we used logistic regression, with results presented as odds ratios (OR). Main outcome measures: Mode of birth, IV syntocinon use, pyrexia (>38 degrees C), antibiotic treatment, first stage labour >10 h, second stage labour >2 h, blood loss (>500 mls, >1000 mls), perineal trauma. Neonatal outcomes included Apgar score >7 at 1 min and 5 min, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and infant feeding method. Results: Women using EA were more likely to require a vacuum-assisted birth (RRR 3.35, p < 0.01) or forceps-assisted birth (RRR 11.69, p < 0.01). Exposure to EA was associated with significantly greater risk of >10 h first (OR 6.72, p = 0.01) and >2 h second (OR 2.25, p < 0.01) stage labour, increased likelihood of receiving IV syntocinon (OR 9.38, p < 0.01), antibiotics (OR 2.97, p < 0.01) and a greater probability of pyrexia (OR 10.26, p < 0.01). Women who used EA were half as likely to be breastfeeding at three months postpartum (OR 0.53, p < 0.01). No differences were observed between groups in neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: Our data shows significant associations between EA use and several intrapartum outcomes. (c) 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据