4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive and robust two-dimensional indium selenide flexible electronics and sensors for human motion detection

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105020

关键词

InSe; Strain engineering; Flexible; Strain sensor; High mobility; Circuit

资金

  1. A*STAR Science and Engineering Research Council [152-70-00013, 152-7000017]
  2. National Research Foundation Competitive Research Programs [NRF-CRP15-2015-01, NRF-CRP15-2015-02]
  3. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its medium sized center program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To accurately detect human motion, a sensing material/device must be flexible, ultrasensitive to strain, and electrically and mechanically robust. However, existing electronics and sensors, which are either not flexible enough, or not ultrasensitive to strain, or suffering from poor on/off ratio and low charge mobility, do not meet these stringent requirements. Here, we demonstrate a flexible and ultrasensitive three-terminal strain sensor based on two-dimensional (2D) InSe for detecting human-motion activities. The 2D InSe exhibits a tunable bandgap and a large piezoresistive effect via strain engineering. Through electrostatic gating effect, the gauge factor of the sensor can be enhanced by 8-fold and 7-fold for a low tensile and compressive strain of only +/- 0.25%, respectively. Remarkably, the fabricated 2D InSe-based transistor achieves both a record high on/off ratio of similar to 10(8) and an electron mobility of similar to 383 cm(2)/V s, superior to all existing ones. Furthermore, flexible InSe logic inverters with a high voltage gain of similar to 10 and a large noise margin of similar to 0.7 x V-DD (supply voltage) are realized under various strain conditions. This work paves the way to enable simultaneous integration of high-performance flexible sensors and electronics based on a common 2D InSe material platform towards achieving a fully integrated sensing system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据