4.6 Article

Homecare Robotic Systems for Healthcare 4.0: Visions and Enabling Technologies

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2990529

关键词

Robot sensing systems; Artificial intelligence; Cloud computing; Diseases; Healthcare 4; 0; cyber-physical systems; homecare; robotics; early diseases prevention; elderly healthcare; artificial intelligence; cloud computing; flexible sensing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51890884, 51975513, 51821093]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR20E050003]
  3. Zhejiang University Special Scientific Research Fund for COVID-19 Prevention and Control [2020XGZX017]
  4. Director Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems [SKLoFP_ZZ_2002]
  5. Robotics Institute of Zhejiang University [K18-508116-008-03]
  6. China's Thousand Talents Plan Young Professionals Program
  7. MIRA, McMaster University
  8. Canada Research Chair Program
  9. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K00117]
  10. KDDI Foundation
  11. Academy of Finland [313448, 313449, 316810, 316811]
  12. Academy of Finland (AKA) [316810, 313449, 313448, 313448, 313449, 316811] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Powered by the technologies that have originated from manufacturing, the fourth revolution of healthcare technologies is happening (Healthcare 4.0). As an example of such revolution, new generation homecare robotic systems (HRS) based on the cyber-physical systems (CPS) with higher speed and more intelligent execution are emerging. In this article, the new visions and features of the CPS-based HRS are proposed. The latest progress in related enabling technologies is reviewed, including artificial intelligence, sensing fundamentals, materials and machines, cloud computing and communication, as well as motion capture and mapping. Finally, the future perspectives of the CPS-based HRS and the technical challenges faced in each technical area are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据