4.7 Article

Production and Functional Characterization of a Recombinant Predicted Pore-Forming Protein (TVSAPLIP12) ofTrichomonas vaginalisinNicotiana benthamianaPlants

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.581066

关键词

Trichomonas vaginalis; pore-forming protein; trichopore; recombinant proteinin planta; microbial virulence

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca, PRIN 2017 [2017SFBFER_004]
  2. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca, FFABR 2018, Finanziamento Una Tantum per la Ricerca, Universita di Sassari

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pore-forming proteins (PFPs) are a group of functionally versatile molecules distributed in all domains of life, and several microbial pathogens notably use members of this class of proteins as cytotoxic effectors. Among pathogenic protists,Entamoeba histolytica, andNaegleria fowleridisplay a range of pore-forming toxins belonging to the Saposin-Like Proteins (Saplip) family: Amoebapores and Naegleriapores. Following the genome sequencing ofTrichomonas vaginalis, we identified a gene family of 12 predicted saposin-like proteins (TvSaplips): this work focuses on investigating the potential role of TvSaplips as cytopathogenetic effectors. We provide evidence thatTvSaplip12gene expression is potently upregulated uponT. vaginaliscontact with target cells. We cloned and expressed recombinant TvSaplip12in plantaand we demonstrate haemolytic, cytotoxic, and bactericidal activities of rTvSaplip12in vitro. Also, evidence for TvSaplip subcellular discrete distribution in cytoplasmic granules is presented. Altogether, our results highlight the importance of TvSaplip inT. vaginalispathogenesis, depicting its involvement in the cytolytic and bactericidal activities during the infection process, leading to predation on host cells and resident vaginal microbiota for essential nutrients acquisition. This hence suggests a potential key role for TvSaplip12 inT. vaginalispathogenesis as a candidateTrichopore.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据