4.2 Review

Exosomes promote bone marrow angiogenesis in hematologic neoplasia: the role of hypoxia

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 268-273

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000235

关键词

angiogenesis; bone marrow microenvironment; exosome; hypoxia; miRNA; multiple myeloma

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Tokyo, Japan [S1311016]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K06841, 15H04303] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewTo review the data on angiogenesis related to exosomes secreted by tumor cells in hematologic neoplasia and to elucidate the role of exosomes and exosomal miRNA in the bone marrow microenvironment, especially under hypoxic conditions.Recent findingsCross-talk between bone marrow tumor cells and surrounding cells, including endothelial cells, is important for tumor growth in hematologic neoplasia. In addition to conventional signaling pathways, exosomes, which are small endosome-derived vesicles containing miRNAs, can help to modulate the microenvironment without directly contacting nontumorous cells. The human myeloid leukemia cell line K562 secretes exosomes containing a large amount of miR-92a that enhances angiogenesis under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. With chronic hypoxia, exosomes secreted by multiple myeloma cells also enhance angiogenesis by targeting factor-inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor-1 via miR-135b.SummaryIntercellular communication between tumor cells and a heterogeneous population of bone marrow stromal cells is mediated by exosomes containing various functional proteins, mRNA, and miRNA. Hypoxia is a major regulator of exosomal content and affects angiogenesis in various types of hematologic neoplasia. Functional analysis of exosomes and exosome-mediated cell-cell interactions not only clarifies molecular pathogenesis but also suggests new treatment strategies for hematologic neoplasia through targeting exosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据