4.6 Article

Oxygen-Vacancy-Rich Cubic CeO2 Nanowires as Catalysts for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 16757-16765

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03861

关键词

CeO2 nanowires; vanadium redox flow battery; oxygen vacancy; VO2+/VO2+ redox couple; electrocatalytic activity

资金

  1. Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan
  2. National Taiwan University of Science and Technology-Tokyo Institute of Technology
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 107-2628-E-011-001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel, low-cost, and powerful cerium-oxide nanowire (CeO2NW) electrode decorated with graphite felt (GF) through a one-step hydrothermal method was proposed in this study. Subsequently, hydrogen annealing was conducted to create defective-hydrogen-annealed CeO(2)NWs decorated with GF (H-CeO(2)NWs-GF) for use in vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs). The electrochemical results show that the H-CeO(2)NWs-GF reveals excellent electrocatalytic effects toward the VO2+/VO2+ redox process in VRFBs at the positive electrode to facilitate the electrochemical kinetics of the VRFBs. The VRFBs using different electrode materials were compared with a VRFB using H-CeO(2)NWs-GF. The results revealed that the VRFB using H-CeO(2)NWs-GF exhibits the highest voltage efficiency of 90.4% at a current density of 40 mA cm(-2), which is significantly higher than those using pristine GF (81.1%) and a CeO2NW electrode decorated with GF (88.4%). The significant improvement in the electrochemical performance of H-CeO(2)NWs-GF might be mostly ascribed to the defect-rich H-CeO(2)NWs on the GF surface, which acts as active sites and reduces the electrochemical polarization of the redox reaction. Moreover, the one-dimensional nature of H-CeO(2)NWs is favorable for the charge-transfer process and improves the accessibility, thus improving the electrode performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据