4.6 Article

Use of Ensemble-Based Gridded Precipitation Products for Assessing Input Data Uncertainty Prior to Hydrologic Modeling

期刊

WATER
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12102751

关键词

uncertainty; hydrology; gridded climate data; precipitation

资金

  1. BaySys project
  2. Manitoba Hydro
  3. ArcticNet
  4. BaySys grant [280926454]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial and temporal performance of an ensemble of five gridded climate datasets (precipitation) (North American Regional Reanalysis, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis, European Union Water and Global Change (WATCH) Watch Forcing data ERA-Interim, Global Forcing Data-Hydro, and The Australian National University spline interpolation) was evaluated towards quantifying gridded precipitation data ensemble uncertainty for hydrologic model input. Performance was evaluated over the Nelson-Churchill Watershed via comparison to two ground-based climate station datasets for year-to-year and season-to-season periods (1981-2010) at three spatial discretizations: distributed, sub-basin aggregation, and full watershed aggregation. All gridded datasets showed spatial performance variations, most notably in year-to-year total precipitation bias. Absolute minimum and maximum realizations were generated and assumed to represent total possible uncertainty bounds of the ensemble. Analyses showed that high magnitude precipitation events were often outside the uncertainty envelope; some increase in spatial aggregation, however, enveloped more observations. Results suggest that hydrologic models can reduce input uncertainty with some spatial aggregation, but begin to lose information as aggregation increases. Uncertainty bounds also revealed periods of elevated uncertainty. Assessing input ensemble bounds can be used to include high and low uncertainty periods in hydrologic model calibration and validation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据