4.7 Article

Woody Aboveground Biomass Mapping of the Brazilian Savanna with a Multi-Sensor and Machine Learning Approach

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs12172685

关键词

aboveground biomass; Cerrado ecosystem; random forest; SAR

资金

  1. UK Space Agency's International Partnership Programme (IPP) under the Global Challenge Research Fund (GCRF)
  2. UK's Natural Environment Research Council [PR140015]
  3. ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (CCI+) project [4000123662/18/I-NB]
  4. Edital Universal-CNPq [445420/2014-6]
  5. INCT MC Fase 2 CNPq [465501/2014-1]
  6. NERC [nceo020005] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tropical savanna in Brazil known as the Cerrado covers circa 23% of the Brazilian territory, but only 3% of this area is protected. High rates of deforestation and degradation in the woodland and forest areas have made the Cerrado the second-largest source of carbon emissions in Brazil. However, data on these emissions are highly uncertain because of the spatial and temporal variability of the aboveground biomass (AGB) in this biome. Remote-sensing data combined with local vegetation inventories provide the means to quantify the AGB at large scales. Here, we quantify the spatial distribution of woody AGB in the Rio Vermelho watershed, located in the centre of the Cerrado, at a high spatial resolution of 30 metres, with a random forest (RF) machine-learning approach. We produced the first high-resolution map of the AGB for a region in the Brazilian Cerrado using a combination of vegetation inventory plots, airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data, and multispectral and radar satellite images (Landsat 8 and ALOS-2/PALSAR-2). A combination of random forest (RF) models and jackknife analyses enabled us to select the best remote-sensing variables to quantify the AGB on a large scale. Overall, the relationship between the ground data from vegetation inventories and remote-sensing variables was strong (R-2= 0.89), with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 7.58 Mg ha(-1)and a bias of 0.43 Mg ha(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据