4.7 Article

Recycling and Reprocessing of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Materials towards Nonwoven Processing

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12091917

关键词

recycling; reprocessing; TPU; thermoplastic elastomers; TPE; thermoplastic; polyurethane; elastomers; nonwoven; processing; melt blown; molar mass; mechanical properties; methylendiphenylisocyanate; MDI; polytetramethylene glycol; PTMG; morphology; structure; phase separation; sustainability; circular economy

资金

  1. Institute of Polymer Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) is a unique tailorable material due to the interactions of hard and soft segments within the block-copolymer chain. Therefore, various products can be created out of this material. A general trend towards a circular economy with regards to sustainability in combination with TPU being comparably expensive is of high interest to recycle production as well as post-consumer wastes. A systematic study investigating the property changes of TPU is provided, focusing on two major aspects. The first aspect focuses on characterizing the change of basic raw material properties through recycling. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and processing load during extrusion indicate a decrease in molar mass and consequently viscosity with an increasing number of recycling cycles. This leads to a change in morphology at lower molar mass, characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and visualized by atomic force microscope (AFM). The change in molar mass and morphology with increasing number of recycling cycles has an impact on the material performance under tensile stress. The second aspect describes processing of the recycled TPU to nonwoven fabrics utilizing melt blowing, which are evaluated with respect to relevant mechanical properties and related to molecular characteristics. The molar mass turns out to be the governing factor regarding mechanical performance and processing conditions for melt blown products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据