4.7 Article

Macromolecular Dyes by Chromophore-Initiated Ring Opening Polymerization of L-Lactide

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12091979

关键词

ring opening polymerization of L-lactide (RPO); chromophores end-capped PLA; dyed PLA; photophysical properties; migration tests; microwave-assisted polymerization

资金

  1. National Project New Polymer Systems with Electric and Optical Functionalities via Nano and Micro Adhesive Dispersion to Produce Materials and Devices for Smart Applications POLOPTEL 2011-2014
  2. La Fondazione CARIPISA [167/09]
  3. MIUR (PRIN 2008), Materiali nanoibridi a base biopoliesteri: miscelazione reattiva di sistemi organici e inorganici opportunamente modificati [200898KCKY]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

End functionalized polylactides are prepared by ring opening polymerization of L-lactide in the presence of stannous octoate (Sn(Oct)(2)). Three chromophores, 9H-carbazol-ethanol (CA), 9-fluorenyl-methanol (FM), and 2-(4-(2-chloro-4-nitrophenylazo)-N-ethylphenylamino)ethanol (Disperse Red 13, DR), are for the first time used as co-initiators in the polymerization process. The polymerization reaction is initiated by conventional thermal treatment, but in the case of FM, microwave-assisted polymerization is also carried out. CA and FM absorb and emit in the UV portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, whereas DR absorbs in the visible part. The obtained end-capped polylactides derivatives show the same photophysical properties as the initiator, so they are macromolecular dyes (MDs) that can be used as synthesized or can be blended with commercial poly(lactic acid) (PLA). The blends of PLA with MDs have ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption and fluorescence emission features similar to that of MDs and thermal properties typical of PLA. Finally, migration tests, carried out onto the blends of PLA with MDs and PLA with free chromophores, show that MDs are less released than free chromophores both in solution and in the solid phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据