4.3 Article

Slow Growth and Increased Spontaneous Mutation Frequency in Respiratory Deficient afo1- Yeast Suppressed by a Dominant Mutation in ATP3

期刊

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 4637-4648

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401537

关键词

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; rho-zero; growth velocity; mutation frequency; ATP3

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P26713]
  2. NIH [GM098629]
  3. Cancer Research UK [FC001134]
  4. UK Medical Research Council [FC001134]
  5. Wellcome Trust [FC001134, IA200829/Z/16/Z]
  6. ERC [StG26809]
  7. WISS2025 Land Salzburg project [P_147200_30]
  8. Francis Crick Institute
  9. [ANR-15-IDEX-01]
  10. [61388971]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A yeast deletion mutation in the nuclear-encoded gene, , which codes for a mitochondrial ribosomal protein, led to slow growth on glucose, the inability to grow on glycerol or ethanol, and loss of mitochondrial DNA and respiration. We noticed that (-) yeast readily obtains secondary mutations that suppress aspects of this phenotype, including its growth defect. We characterized and identified a dominant missense suppressor mutation in the gene. Comparing isogenic slowly growing rho-zero and rapidly growing suppressed (-) strains under carefully controlled fermentation conditions showed that energy charge was not significantly different between strains and was not causal for the observed growth properties. Surprisingly, in a wild-type background, the dominant suppressor allele of still allowed respiratory growth but increased the petite frequency. Similarly, a slow-growing respiratory deficient afo1(-) strain displayed an about twofold increase in spontaneous frequency of point mutations (comparable to the rho-zero strain) while the suppressed strain showed mutation frequency comparable to the respiratory-competent WT strain. We conclude, that phenotypes that result from afo1(-) are mostly explained by rapidly emerging mutations that compensate for the slow growth that typically follows respiratory deficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据