4.1 Review

Tools to assess the quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1841638

关键词

Assessment tool; outcome measure; Parkinson’ s disease; psychometric properties; quality of life; systematic review; validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the most frequently used scales for assessing quality of life in patients with PD are the 39-item and 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) (PDQ-8). These findings suggest that further exploration of existing PD outcome measures would benefit patients, researchers, and clinicians. Validated, universal outcome measures are needed to allow for comparisons across practice, highlighting the importance of using a common set of outcome assessments based on the results of this review for future researchers.
Introduction The clinical, social, and economic implications of Parkinson's disease (PD) are significant; disability occurs leading to a low quality of life (QoL). Information on the QoL of patients with PD and studies on the relationship between QoL and motor and cognitive function are necessary for both research and clinical use to make informed decisions in healthcare and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to determine which scales are most used to assess QoL in patients with PD. Area covered A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Two authors independently identified eligible studies based on predefined inclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality and the risk of bias were assessed using the COSMIN checklist. Expert opinion 116 suitable studies were included, and 42 different instruments were identified. The most frequently used scales were the 39-items and 8-items Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) (PDQ-8). These findings suggest further investigation of existing PD outcome measures would benefit patients, researchers, and clinicians. Validated, universal outcome measures are required to allow comparisons across practice; therefore, we recommend that future researchers use a common set of outcome assessments based on the results of this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据