4.4 Article

Formal evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women-the patient perspective

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 E102-E108

出版社

MULTIMED INC
DOI: 10.3747/co.23.2773

关键词

Breast cancer; young women; support groups; oncofertility; psychosocial interventions; nurse navigator

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The aim of the present study was to assess patient satisfaction with PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women so as to determine how the program might be improved and to provide feedback to donors. Methods All PYNK patients who had consented to have their information entered in our database and who supplied us with their e-mail address were invited to complete a 58-item online questionnaire consisting of multiple choice and open-ended questions. Domains included demographics, provision of written and spoken information, support, infertility risk, research awareness, attitudes toward discharge, and general feedback. Results Of 120 PYNK patients approached, 61 (51%) participated. More than 90% were satisfied or very satisfied with the timing, usefulness, and clarity of spoken and written information given, and 69% found the service and support provided by the nurse navigator to be the most helpful component of the program. Of those who had received systemic therapy, 93% recalled a health care provider initiating a discussion of the risk of treatment-related infertility, and 67% were referred to a fertility clinic. On the negative side, 11%-27% were unaware of various services provided by PYNK, and 11% were unaware of PYNK's ongoing research. One third of patients were unhappy or ambivalent about the prospect of discharge from the program. Conclusions Patient satisfaction with this novel program for young women with breast cancer is high. This study highlights the critical role that the nurse navigator plays in patient support and dissemination of information. In contrast to other reported surveys of young cancer patients, PYNK patients are routinely given the opportunity to undergo fertility preservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据