4.4 Article

Experimental and numerical analysis of dynamic failure of welded aluminium alloy plates under air blast loading

期刊

SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 531-540

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2020.1835076

关键词

Experiment; numerical simulation; aluminium alloy; welded plate; air blast loading; ductile fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51979209]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2018III075GX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents experiments and finite element simulations of welded aluminium-alloy 5083-H111 plates under near-field air-blast loadings to examine their dynamic plastic deformation and failure. The study reveals the impact behavior of the welded aluminium plates in contrast to the steel plates. The effect of explosive charge-plate distance and the weld seam on the structural dynamic response is evaluated.
The paper presents experiments and finite element simulations of welded aluminium-alloy 5083-H111 plates under near-field air-blast loadings to examine their dynamic plastic deformation and failure. The material degradation takes place in the heat-affected zone affecting the failure mode of aluminium plates. Five specimens are assessed, one bare plate and four butt-welded plates. The effect of the explosive charge-plate distance and the weld seam on the structural dynamic response is evaluated. The scenario could represent an air blast action on the superstructure of aluminium-alloy vessels. The experimentally obtained deformation and failure shapes of specimens show agreement with the simulations performed by the ABAQUS finite element solver. Moreover, the finite element analysis discusses the structural deformation and rupture process of the welded aluminium alloy plates under air-blast loading and their energy transmission and absorption. The present study reveals the impact behaviour of the welded aluminium plates in contrast to the steel plates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据