4.7 Article

The role of prognostic nutritional index for clinical outcomes of gastric cancer after total gastrectomy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74525-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Youth Science Grant of Peking University, First Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the relationship between the nutrition-based microenvironment and clinicopathological information for gastric cancer patients and to investigate the prognostic value of nutrition index for gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy. We retrospectively collected clinical information of 245 gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy in our hospital between January 1st 2005 and December 30th 2015. According to the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) level, they were divided into low PNI (<43) group and high PNI (43) group. The relationship between PNI and the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by statistical analysis. Univariate analyses demonstrated that TNM stage (p=0.025), patients age (p=0.042), lymph node metastasis (p=0.028), tumor differentiation (p=0.037) and a low PNI (p=0.033) were closely correlated with a poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, TNM stage (p=0.027) and a low PNI (p=0.041) were found to be independently associated with poor survival. Additionally, when age was considered as a stratified factor, univariate analyses demonstrated that low PNI correlated with shorter DFS in non-elderly (<65) patients (p=0.022) and shorter DFS (p=0.036) and OS (p=0.047) in elderly (65) patients. The low prognostic nutritional index is an independent risk factor associated with poor gastric cancer survival which represents the nutritional microenvironment. Patients with low pre-operative prognostic nutritional index levels should be observed more closely after surgery to prevent the occurrence of post-operative complications in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据