4.7 Article

Heavy metal pollution and risk assessment by the battery of toxicity tests

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73468-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University (KSU) [RG-215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study was carried out on dominant fish Oreochromis niloticus and water collected from the polluted Yamuna River, Agra, India. The heavy metals in water, recorded as follows: Fe>Mn>Zn>Cu>Ni>Cr>Cd and all were found to be above the prescribed limits. According to metal pollution index, exposed muscle (49.86), kidney (47.68) and liver (45.26) have been recorded to have higher bioaccumulation. The blood biochemical analysis of exposed O. niloticus indicated significant increase in activities of aspartate aminotransferase (+343.5%), alkaline phosphatase (+673.6%), alanine aminotransferase (+309.1%), and creatinine (+494.3%) over the reference. However, a significant decrease in albumin (A): globulins (G) ratio (-87.86%) was observed. Similarly, the exposed fish also showed significant increase in total leucocyte count (+121%), differential leucocyte count, respiratory burst (+1175%), and nitric oxide synthase (+420%). The histological examination of liver and kidney showed tissue injury. Moreover, micronuclei (0.95%), kidney shaped nuclei (1.2%), and lobed nuclei (0.6%) along with DNA damage in the form of mean tail length in the liver (20.7 mu m) and kidney (16.5 mu m) was observed in the exposed O. niloticus. Potential health risk assessments based on estimated daily intake, target hazard quotient, hazard index, and target cancer risk indicated health risks associated with the consumption of these contaminated fishes. In conclusion, the present study showed that exposure to heavy metals contaminated water can alter immunological response; induce histopathological alterations and DNA damage in the studied fish. The consumption of this contaminated water or fish could have serious impact on human health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据