4.7 Article

Chemically synthesized chevron-like graphene nanoribbons for electrochemical sensors development: determination of epinephrine

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71554-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [MAT2017-85089-C2-1-R, MAT2017-85089-C2-2-R]
  2. MINECO [MAT2016-78293-C6-3-R]
  3. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [P2018/NMT-4349 TRANSNANOAVANSENS-CM, S2013/MIT-3029, PEJD-2017/IND4130]
  4. Xunta de Galicia (Centro singular de1 investigacion de Galicia, accreditation 2016-2019) [ED431G/09]
  5. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We employ chevron-like graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) synthesized by a solution-based chemical route to develop a novel electrochemical sensor for determination of the neurotransmitter epinephrine (EPI). The sensor surface, a glassy carbon electrode modified with GNRs, is characterized by atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy, which show that the electrode surface modification comprises of bi-dimensional multilayer-stacked GNRs that retain their molecular structure. The charge transfer process occurring at the electrode interface is evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The sensor is applied to the determination of EPI, employing as an analytical signal the reduction peak corresponding to the epinephrinechrome-leucoepinephrinechrome transition (E=- 0.25 V) instead of the oxidation peak usually employed in the literature (E=+0.6 V) in order to minimize interferences. The results obtained demonstrate that chevron-like nanoribbons synthesized by solution methods exhibit reliable electrocatalytic activity for EPI determination. Using differential pulse voltammetry, we obtain a linear concentration range from 6.4x10(-6) to 1.0x10(-4) M and a detection limit of 2.1x10(-6) M. The applicability of the sensor was evaluated by determining EPI in pharmaceutical samples with satisfactory results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据