4.7 Review

Impact of Strategies for Preventing Obesity and Risk Factors for Eating Disorders among Adolescents: A Systematic Review

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12103134

关键词

obesity; eating disorders; adolescents; prevention programs; systematic review

资金

  1. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/20852-7]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [402674/2016-2, 301597/207-0]
  3. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation [2017/23115-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective behavior change program is the first line of prevention for youth obesity. However, effectiveness in prevention of adolescent obesity requires several approaches, with special attention paid to disordered eating behaviors and psychological support, among other environmental factors. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the impact of two types of obesity prevention programs, inclusive of behavior change components, on weight outcomes. Energy-balance studies are aimed at reducing calories from high-energy sources and increasing physical activity (PA) levels, while shared risk factors for obesity and eating disorders focus on reducing disordered eating behaviors to promote a positive food and eating relationship. A systematic search of ProQuest, PubMed, PsycInfo, SciELO, and Web of Science identified 8825 articles. Thirty-five studies were included in the review, of which 20 regarded energy-balance and 15 shared risk factors for obesity and eating disorders. Energy-balance studies were unable to support maintenance weight status, diet, and PA. Shared risk factors for obesity and eating disorders programs also did not result in significant differences in weight status over time. However, the majority of shared risk factors for obesity and eating disorders studies demonstrated reduced body dissatisfaction, dieting, and weight-control behaviors. Research is needed to examine how a shared risk factor approach can address both obesity and eating disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据