4.6 Article

Sex Differences in Electrophysiological Properties of Mouse Medial Preoptic Area Neurons Revealed byIn VitroWhole-cell Recordings

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 166-182

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-020-00565-9

关键词

Electrophysiological properties; Sex differences; mPOA; Post-inhibitory rebound; T-type calcium channels

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871066, 31922028, 31900721]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX05]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB32000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed significant differences in the electrophysiological properties of mPOA neurons between males and females, with males showing higher input resistance and post-inhibitory rebound. Additionally, the current mediated by the T-type Ca(2+) channel was found to be larger in male mPOA neurons.
Despite extensive characterization of sex differences in the medial preoptic area (mPOA) of the hypothalamus, we know surprisingly little about whether or how male and female mPOA neurons differ electrophysiologically, especially in terms of neuronal firing and behavioral pattern generation. In this study, by performing whole-cell patch clamp recordings of the mPOA, we investigated the influences of sex, cell type, and gonadal hormones on the electrophysiological properties of mPOA neurons. Notably, we uncovered significant sex differences in input resistance (male > female) and in the percentage of neurons that displayed post-inhibitory rebound (male > female). Furthermore, we found that the current mediated by the T-type Ca(2+)channel (I-T), which is known to underlie post-inhibitory rebound, was indeed larger in male mPOA neurons. Thus, we have identified salient electrophysiological properties of mPOA neurons, namelyI(T)and post-inhibitory rebound, that are male-biased and likely contribute to the sexually dimorphic display of behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据