4.5 Article

Validation of a three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based software to calculate fractional flow reserve: the FAST study

期刊

EUROINTERVENTION
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 591-599

出版社

EUROPA EDITION
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00466

关键词

fractional flow reserve; other technique; QCA; stable angina

资金

  1. Pie Medical Imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The aim of study was to validate novel software to calculate vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) based on 3D-QCA and to assess inter-observer variability in patients who underwent routine preprocedural FFR assessment for intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods and results: In vitro validation was performed in an experimental model. Clinical validation was performed in an observational, retrospective, single-centre cohort study. A total of 100 patients presenting with stable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and an indication to perform FFR between January 2016 and October 2016 were included. vFFR was calculated based on the aortic root pressure along with two angiographic projections and validated against pressure wire-derived FFR. Mean FFR and vFFR were 0.82 +/- 0.08 and 0.841-0.07, respectively. A good linear correlation was found between FFR and vFFR (1=0.89; p<0.001). Assessment of vFFR had a low inter-observer variability (1=0.95; p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of vFFR in identifying lesions with an FFR <= 0.80 was higher as compared with 3D-QCA: AUC 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97) vs 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.77), respectively. Conclusions: The 3D-QCA-derived vFFR has a high linear correlation to invasively measured FFR, a high diagnostic accuracy to detect FFR <= 0.80 and a low inter-observer variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据