4.3 Article

Endoscopic resection versus esophagectomy for patients with small-sized T1N0 esophageal cancer: A propensity-matched study

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.09.004

关键词

Esophageal cancer; Endoscopic resection; Esophagectomy; Survival; SEER program

资金

  1. Shanghai Hospital Development Center [SHDC12015116]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC81770091]
  3. Suzhou Key Laboratory of Thoracic Oncology [SZS201907]
  4. Suzhou Key Discipline for Medicine [SZXK201803]
  5. Municipal Program of People's Livelihood Science and Technology in Suzhou [SS2019061]
  6. Jiangsu Key Research and Development Plan (Social Development) Project [BE2020653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the outcomes of ER and esophagectomy for small-sized T1a and T1b esophageal cancer patients, finding that in stage T1 esophageal cancer, ER was similar to esophagectomy in terms of oncologic outcomes, and more prospective studies should be implemented for T1b patients.
Objectives: Endoscopic resection (ER) has been rapidly adopted in the treatment of early-stage esophageal cancer. We aimed to compare the outcomes of ER with esophagectomy for patients with small-sized (<= 2 cm) stage T1a and T1b esophageal cancer in a population-based cohort. Methods: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with T1N0M0 esophageal cancer who underwent ER or esophagectomy and generated a balanced cohort with 217 matched pairs using propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan & mdash;Meier method and multivariable Cox regression analysis were employed to investigate the matched cohort. Subgroup analyses of T stage were also performed. Results: We identified 702 patients; 309 (44.0 %) underwent ER, and 393 (56.0 %) underwent esophagectomy. In the unmatched cohort, patients who underwent ER were older, more likely to have a T1a stage, and less likely to receive lymph node sampling. In the entire matched cohort, multivariate analysis found esophagectomy were associated with better overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.40 & mdash;0.96, p = 0.032) than ER, but no significant difference in esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) (HR: 1.37, 95 % CI: 0.64 & mdash;2.96, p = 0.420) between the two procedures. The results were similar for subgroup analyses of stage T1b patients. However, ER and esophagectomy were associated with similar OS (HR: 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.41 & mdash;1.36; p = 0.334) and ECSS (HR: 3.69, 95 % CI: 0.95 & mdash;14.39; p = 0.060) in patients with stage T1a disease. Conclusions: In patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer, ER was similar to esophagectomy in terms of oncologic outcomes. More prospective studies should be implemented to determine the optimal treatment for T1b esophageal cancer patients with risk factors. (c) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据