4.8 Article

The Electronic Structure of MAPI-Based Perovskite Solar Cells: Detailed Band Diagram Determination by Photoemission Spectroscopy Comparing Classical and Inverted Device Stacks

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 42, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202002129

关键词

energy band diagrams; perovskite solar cells; photoelectron spectroscopy; surface photovoltage

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [196886395, SPP 2196, 423746744]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the Project title Perosol [03SF0483A]
  3. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) under the Project title CAPITANO [03EE1038B]
  4. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cells (PSCs) rely on optimal alignment of the energy bands between the perovskite absorber and the adjacent charge extraction layers. However, since most of the materials and devices of high performance are prepared by solution-based techniques, a deposition of films with thicknesses of a few nanometers and therefore a detailed analysis of surface and interface properties remains difficult. To identify the respective photoactive interfaces, photoelectron spectroscopy measurements are performed on device stacks of methylammonium-lead-iodide (MAPI)-based PSCs in classical and inverted architectures in the dark and under illumination at open-circuit conditions. The analysis shows that vacuum-deposited MAPI perovskite absorber layers are n-type, independent of the architecture and of the charge transport layer that it is deposited on (n-type SnO(2)or p-type NiOx). It is found that the majority of the photovoltage is formed at the n-MAPI/p-HEL (hole extraction layer) junction for both architectures, highlighting the importance of this interface for further improvement of the photovoltage and therefore also the PCE. Finally, an experimentally derived band diagram of the completed devices for the dark and the illuminated case is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据