4.8 Article

AmpliconReconstructor integrates NGS and optical mapping to resolve the complex structures of focal amplifications

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18099-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [GM114362, RR24851]
  2. Salk Innovation Grant
  3. Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Program
  4. Hearst Foundation
  5. Glenn Center for Research on Aging at the Salk Institute
  6. Salk Women and Science award
  7. UCSD Microscopy Core (NINDS) [NS047101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oncogene amplification, a major driver of cancer pathogenicity, is often mediated through focal amplification of genomic segments. Recent results implicate extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) as the primary driver of focal copy number amplification (fCNA) - enabling gene amplification, rapid tumor evolution, and the rewiring of regulatory circuitry. Resolving an fCNA's structure is a first step in deciphering the mechanisms of its genesis and the fCNA's subsequent biological consequences. We introduce a computational method, AmpliconReconstructor (AR), for integrating optical mapping (OM) of long DNA fragments (>150kb) with next-generation sequencing (NGS) to resolve fCNAs at single-nucleotide resolution. AR uses an NGS-derived breakpoint graph alongside OM scaffolds to produce high-fidelity reconstructions. After validating its performance through multiple simulation strategies, AR reconstructed fCNAs in seven cancer cell lines to reveal the complex architecture of ecDNA, a breakage-fusion-bridge and other complex rearrangements. By reconstructing the rearrangement signatures associated with an fCNA's generative mechanism, AR enables a more thorough understanding of the origins of fCNAs. Focal copy number amplifications (fCNAs), which drive cancer pathogenicity, arise by a number of mechanisms and can be challenging to call. Here the authors present AmpliconReconstructor for precise and scalable fCNA reconstruction using optical mapping and next-generation sequencing data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据