4.8 Article

Structural basis of mammalian mucin processing by the human gut O-glycopeptidase OgpA from Akkermansia muciniphila

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18696-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. MINECO/FEDER EU [BFU2016-77427-C2-2-R, BFU2017-92223-EXP]
  2. MINECO/FEDER EU contract Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation [SEV-2016-0644]
  3. Basque Government [KK-2019/00076]
  4. NIH [R01AI149297]
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [844905]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [844905] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Akkermansia muciniphila is a mucin-degrading bacterium commonly found in the human gut that promotes a beneficial effect on health, likely based on the regulation of mucus thickness and gut barrier integrity, but also on the modulation of the immune system. In this work, we focus in OgpA from A. muciniphila, an O-glycopeptidase that exclusively hydrolyzes the peptide bond N-terminal to serine or threonine residues substituted with an O-glycan. We determine the high-resolution X-ray crystal structures of the unliganded form of OgpA, the complex with the glycodrosocin O-glycopeptide substrate and its product, providing a comprehensive set of snapshots of the enzyme along the catalytic cycle. In combination with O-glycopeptide chemistry, enzyme kinetics, and computational methods we unveil the molecular mechanism of O-glycan recognition and specificity for OgpA. The data also contribute to understanding how A. muciniphila processes mucins in the gut, as well as analysis of post-translational O-glycosylation events in proteins. OgpA is an O-glycopeptidase from Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucin-degrading bacterium commonly found in the human gut. A thorough characterization of OgpA, including crystal structures in complex with substrate or product, reveals molecular basis of O-glycan recognition and enzyme specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据