4.7 Review

Stem/progenitor cell-based transplantation for retinal degeneration: a review of clinical trials

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-02955-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [81870687]
  2. Key R&D program of China [2018YFC1106100]
  3. Key program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [19JC1415503]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support [20161316]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [17DZ2260100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinal degeneration (RD) is one of the dominant causes of irreversible vision impairment and blindness worldwide. However, the current effective therapeutics for RD in the ophthalmologic clinic are unclear and controversial. In recent years, extensively investigated stem/progenitor cells-including retinal progenitor cells (RPCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)-with proliferation and multidirectional differentiation potential have presented opportunities to revolutionise the ultimate clinical management of RD. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview on the progression of clinical trials for RD treatment using four types of stem/progenitor cell-based transplantation to replace degenerative retinal cells and/or to supplement trophic factors from the aspects of safety, effectiveness and their respective advantages and disadvantages. In addition, we also discuss the emerging role of stem cells in the secretion of multifunctional nanoscale exosomes by which stem cells could be further exploited as a potential RD therapy. This review will facilitate the understanding of scientists and clinicians of the enormous promise of stem/progenitor cell-based transplantation for RD treatment, and provide incentive for superior employment of such strategies that may be suitable for treatment of other diseases, such as stroke and ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据