4.7 Article

UBAC2 promotes bladder cancer proliferation through BCRC-3/miRNA-182-5p/p27 axis

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-02935-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100464, 81200883, 81772724, 81974396, 81570685]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [2018061]
  3. Medical Key Technologies R&D Program of Henan [201702031, 201702015]
  4. Key Program of the Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province, China [20A320032, 20A320044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emerging evidences have demonstrated that ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein 2 (UBAC2) is closely related to the occurrence and development of malignant tumors. However, the functions and underlying molecular mechanisms of UBAC2 in bladder cancer (BC) development have not been defined. In this study, we found that both UBAC2 mRNA and protein levels were upregulated in BC tissues and cell lines, and knockdown of UBAC2 inhibited BC cells proliferation both in vitro and in vivo. Meanwhile, Kaplan-Meier survival plots of 406 BC cases from TCGA database showed that higher expression of UBAC2 in BC patients was associated with lower survival rate. Mechanistic studies revealed that knockdown of UBAC2 increased the expression of p27 by posttranscriptional regulation. Our previous study indicated that circular RNA BCRC-3 (BCRC-3) promoted the expression of p27 through interacting with miR-182-5p, and reversed miR-182-5p-induced inhibition of p27 3 ' UTR activity. In the present study, we found that UBAC2 could bind to BCRC-3, and subsequently affected the interaction of BCRC-3 with miR-182-5p to inhibit the expression of p27. Furthermore, knockdown of BCRC-3 partly reversed the upregulation of p27 expression induced by knockdown of UBAC2. Our findings highlight a novel mechanism of UBAC2 in regulating p27 through affecting the function of BCRC-3, and provide a research basis for the diagnostic and therapeutic application of BC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据