4.5 Article

Minimal main pancreatic duct dilatation in small branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms associated with high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma

期刊

HPB
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 468-474

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the incidence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma in patients with small branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BDIPMNs). The risk of harboring high-risk disease remains low in small BD-IPMNs, but Sendai-negative patients who are older than 65 years old and those with minimal dilation of MPD are at higher risk of high-risk lesions.
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma in patients with small branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BDIPMNs). Methods: 923 patients who underwent surgical resection for an IPMN were identified. Sendai-negative patients were identified as those without history of pancreatitis or jaundice, main pancreatic duct size (MPD) <5 mm, cyst size <3 cm, no mural nodules, negative cyst fluid cytology for adenocarcinoma, or serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) <37 U/L. Results: BD-IPMN was identified in 388 (46.4%) patients and 89 (22.9%) were categorized as Sendai negative. Overall, 68 (17.5%) of BD-IPMN had HGD and 62 (16.0%) had an associated invasive carcinoma. Among the 89 Sendai-negative patients, 12 (13.5%) had IPMNs with HGD and only one patient (1.1%) had invasive-carcinoma. Of note, older age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.23; P = 0.008) and minimal dilation of MPD (OR 11.3, 95% CI 2.40-53.65; P = 0.002) were associated with high-risk disease in Sendai-negative patients after multivariable risk adjustment. Conclusion: The risk of harboring a high-risk disease remains low in small BD-IPMNs. However, Sendai-negative patients who are older than 65 years old and those with minimal dilation of MPD (3-5 mm) are at greater risk of high-risk lesions and should be given consideration to be included as a worrisome feature in a future guidelines update.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据