4.5 Article

Neutrophil extracellular traps as a novel biomarker to predict recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with primary hepatic malignancies

期刊

HPB
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 309-320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.06.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found a correlation between pre-operative NET levels and survival in patients with liver cancer, where high NET levels were associated with shorter recurrence-free survival and overall survival.
Background: The incidence of primary hepatic malignancies including Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is on the rise. (i) Surgery remains the mainstay of potential curative treatment, however the vast majority of patients will recur and not be amenable to curative therapy. (ii) Inflammation has been associated with poor prognosis, however there is no preoperative marker that can predict recurrence -free-or overall survival. Our aim is to correlate inflammation measured as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) with survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using sera/tissue from patients with hepatic malignancies. NET levels were measured in the serum (MPO-DNA) or tumor (Cit-H3). Log rank analysis for RFS/OS was performed. Results: Cancer patients had higher pre-surgery MPO-DNA levels compared to healthy individuals (healthy vs cancer: 2.6 +/- 1.0 ng/ml vs 34.7 +/- 2.13 ng/ml; p < 0.0001). High pre-surgery serum NET levels were associated with shorter RFS/OS compared to those with low levels (RFS-HCC: HR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.61-5.26, p < 0.0001, RFS-CC: HR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.33-7.77 p < 0.0093). High Cit-H3 tumor levels similarly predicted shorter RFS/OS. Conclusion: The current study shows a correlation between pre-operative NET levels and survival. Studying NET formation as a biomarker pre-surgery can help identify patients that could benefit from closer follow-up due to higher risk for recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据