期刊
ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 801-819出版社
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11634-020-00418-3
关键词
Comparative study; Counterfactual explanations; Instance-level explanations; Explainable artificial intelligence; Explanation algorithms; Binary classification; Behavioral data; Textual data
资金
- Research Foundation - Flanders [11G4319N]
Predictive systems based on high-dimensional behavioral and textual data have serious comprehensibility and transparency issues: linear models require investigating thousands of coefficients, while the opaqueness of nonlinear models makes things worse. Counterfactual explanations are becoming increasingly popular for generating insight into model predictions. This study aligns the recently proposed linear interpretable model-agnostic explainer and Shapley additive explanations with the notion of counterfactual explanations, and empirically compares the effectiveness and efficiency of these novel algorithms against a model-agnostic heuristic search algorithm for finding evidence counterfactuals using 13 behavioral and textual data sets. We show that different search methods have different strengths, and importantly, that there is much room for future research.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据