4.5 Article

The association between supervisor support and ethical dilemmas on Nurses' intention to leave: The mediating role of the meaning of work

期刊

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 286-293

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13153

关键词

ethical dilemmas; intention to leave; management; meaning of work; nursing

资金

  1. Stavanger University Hospital
  2. attending health region, University of Stavanger

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that supervisor support and ethical dilemmas can directly or indirectly affect nurses' intention to leave through the meaning of work. Therefore, healthcare organizations should enhance supervisor support, cultivate the meaning of work, and reduce ethical dilemmas to retain nurses.
Aim To examine the association between supervisor support and ethical dilemmas on nurses' intention to leave health care organisations, both directly and through the mediating role of the meaning of work. Background The shortage of nurses makes it vital that organisations retain nurses and so reduce the costs associated with replacing experienced nurses. Methods This cross-sectional study samples 2,946 registered nurses from a selected health region in Norway. Structural equation modelling was used to test a hypothesized model. Results Social support from the supervisor and ethical dilemmas is associated with nurses' intention to leave, both directly and indirectly through the mediating role of the meaning of work. Conclusion Health care organisations should enhance social support from supervisors and the meaning of work, and reduce the level of ethical dilemmas in hospitals. Implications for Nursing Management Health care organisations should continuously develop and offer training in nurse manager skills, such as being empathic, understanding employees' needs and how to communicate and handle ethical dilemmas. Managers should value staff contributions, encourage staff involvement in ethical questions and highlight the impact of nurses' work on improving the welfare of others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据