4.7 Article

Temperature-dependent abrasivity of Bukit Timah granite and implications for drill bit wear in thermo-mechanical drilling

期刊

ACTA GEOTECHNICA
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 885-893

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-020-01056-x

关键词

Cerchar abrasivity index; Drill bit wear; Microstructure evolution; Thermal treatment

资金

  1. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermo-mechanical drilling combines flame thermal treatment and rotary head drilling to achieve high penetration rates and low drill bit wear in granitic rocks. The Cerchar abrasivity test results indicate that overheating rocks may lead to increased abrasive minerals exposure and enhanced drill bit wear.
Thermo-mechanical drilling combines the advantages of flame thermal treatment and rotary head drilling to achieve a high penetration rate in granitic rocks and a low wear rate of drill bits. This drilling strategy has been recognized as a potential technique to develop deep geothermal energy, but further improvement is still needed to optimize the drilling efficiency, such as the reduction in drill bit wear in thermally treated rocks. We use the Cerchar abrasivity test to investigate the abrasivity characteristics of Bukit Timah granite after the thermal treatment at different high temperatures. The Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI) decreases from 3.5 at 25 degrees C to 3.0 at 400 degrees C, remains constant between 400 and 600 degrees C and subsequently increases to 4.1 at 800 degrees C. Based on the meso-scale and micro-scale observations using polarizing microscope, 3D scanner and scanning electron microscope, the reduction in CAI value at lower temperatures is due to the abrasive wear of stylus tip, while the mechanical interaction between the stylus cone and abrasive minerals causes the increase in CAI value at higher temperatures. The Cerchar abrasivity test results indicate that overheating rocks may result in the exposure of drill bits to more abrasive minerals and enhance drill bit wear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据