4.5 Article

Isolation and Characterization of Nanocrystalline Cellulose from Ramie Fibers via Phosphoric Acid Hydrolysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 2744-2755

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1821292

关键词

Nanocrystalline cellulose; ramie fibers; phosphoric acid concentration; hydrolysis time; crystallinity index; thermal stability

资金

  1. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia [110/UN1/DITLIT/DIT-LIT/LIT/2018, 2645/UN1.DITLIT/DIT-LIT/LT/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) was successfully isolated from ramie fibers through chemical pretreatments and phosphoric acid hydrolysis. The characteristics of NCC were found to be significantly affected by the acid concentration but not the hydrolysis time.
Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) was successfully isolated using cellulose extracted from ramie fibers via chemical pretreatments followed by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. The effects of acid concentrations and hydrolysis times on the characteristics of the NCC were investigated in this work. The obtained NCCs were characterized using Fourier infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy confirmed that hemicellulose and lignin were removed during the chemical pretreatments and hydrolysis. The results showed that the crystallinity index increased with increasing an acid concentration up to 16 M and then decreased drastically. The optimal acid concentration was found to be 16 M phosphoric acid at 150 degrees C for 90 min during hydrolysis resulting in a rod-shaped NCC with a high crystallinity (89.28%), the average diameter (21.4 nm), and the average length (215.4 nm). The thermal stability was found to decrease with increasing acid concentration. The characteristic of NCCs was affected significantly by the acid concentration but not the hydrolysis time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据