4.5 Article

Bioactivity of volatile organic compounds byAureobasidiumspecies against gray mold of tomato and table grape

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-020-02947-7

关键词

Antibiosis; Botrytis cinerea; Postharvest; VOCs

资金

  1. Alma Mater Studiorum Universita di Bologna within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aureobasidiumstrains isolated from diverse unconventional environments belonging to the speciesA. pullulans,A. melanogenum, andA. subglacialewere evaluated for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) production as a part of their modes of action againstBotrytis cinereaof tomato and table grape. By in vitro assay, VOCs generated by the antagonists belonging to the speciesA. subglacialeshowed the highest inhibition percentage of the pathogen mycelial growth (65.4%). In vivo tests were conducted with tomatoes and grapes artificially inoculated withB. cinereaconidial suspension, and exposed to VOCs emitted by the most efficient antagonists of each species (AP1, AM10, AS14) showing that VOCs of AP1 (A. pullulans) reduced the incidence by 67%, partially confirmed by the in vitro results. Conversely, on table grape, VOCs produced by all the strains did not control the fungal incidence but were only reducing the infection severity (< 44.4% byA. pullulans; < 30.5% byA. melanogenum, andA. subglaciale). Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and subsequent gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry identified ethanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol as the most produced VOCs. However, there were differences in the amounts of produced VOCs as well as in their repertoire. The EC(50)values of VOCs for reduction of mycelial growth ofB. cinereauncovered 3-methyl-1-butanol as the most effective compound. The study demonstrated that the production and the efficacy of VOCs byAureobasidiumcould be directly related to the specific species and pathosystem and uncovers new possibilities for searching more efficient VOCs producing strains in unconventional habitats other than plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据