4.7 Article

Multicriteria Decision Support for Selection of Alternatives Directed to Integrated Urban Water Management

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 34, 期 13, 页码 4253-4269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02671-9

关键词

Rainwater harvesting; Gray water recycling; Water saving devices; Multicriteria decision aid; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

资金

  1. Foundation for the Support of Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco (FACEPE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The management of water resources in medium and large cities has been changing in recent years, mainly as a result of climate change and the sharp increase of urbanization. In addition to the traditional solution of expansion of water supply, an approach that integrates technological alternatives of demand management in the infrastructure of urban constructions is proposed herein. However, these facilities are often more complex and expensive than conventional ones, being also challenging to achieve a balance between costs and benefits. While the environmental, social, and engineering benefits seem obvious, expressing them in monetary terms is usually a challenge that cost-effectiveness do not respond satisfactorily. Therefore, this research uses the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process multiple criteria method to rank three main alternatives (rainwater harvesting system, gray water recycling system, and water saving devices) that can be applied in low-income residences in Brazil. For this purpose, this paper considers criteria normally used in this type of analysis such as economic, technical, environmental and social criteria but also includes the local population acceptance and the evaluation of experts. The main results suggest that the most appropriate alternative is the use of water saving devices and that there is also a need for public policies that offer financial incentives to the population and prevent socioeconomic conditions from inhibiting the adoption of water conservation practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据