4.8 Article

Enhancing peroxymonosulfate activation of Fe-Al layered double hydroxide by dissolved organic matter: Performance and mechanism

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 185, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116246

关键词

Dissolved organic matter; Layered double hydroxide; Peroxymonosulfate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41972037, 41673092]
  2. Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B1515120015]
  3. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2020B121201003]
  4. Guangdong Special Support Program for Millions of Leading Engineering Talents [201626011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation of FeAl layered double hydroxide (FeAl-LDH) was enhanced by compounding dissolved organic matter (DOM). The characterization and catalytic performance of FeAl-LDH and DOM-LDH were investigated. The results revealed that the physicochemical properties of DOM-LDH were superior to FeAl-LDH: (i) The higher proportion of Fe(II) was found in DOM-LDH, mainly existed in the form of trans-coordinated octahedral Fe(II); (ii) DOM-LDH showed a flower-like morphology with larger specific surface area, pore width and pore volume; (iii) More functional groups and surface oxygen vacancies were found in DOM-LDH. Moreover, DOM promoted the process of PMS activation by accelerating Fe(III) reduction with humic acid-like compounds. The results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and quenching experiments indicated that more reactive oxygen species (ROS) were generated in DOM-LDH/PMS system, center dot OH was considered as the dominant ROS for Bisphenol A (BPA) degradation. As a result, the degradation efficiency for BPA (20 mg L-1) in FeAl-LDH/PMS system was increased from 60% to 93% within 60 min after the introduction of DOM. This work is expected to facilitate the design and application of Fe(II)/PMS system for environmental protection. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据