4.8 Article

Impact of chlorination and pre-ozonation on disinfection by-products formation from aqueous suspensions of cyanobacteria: Microcystis aeruginosa, Anabaena aequalis and Oscillatoria tenuis

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116070

关键词

Cyanobacteria; Chlorination; Ozonation: disinfection by-products

资金

  1. Fundacion Ramon Areces (XVIII Concurso Nacional para la Adjudicacion de Ayudas a la Investigacion en Ciencias de la Vida y de la Materia, 2016)
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [RTI 2018-099482-AI00]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana grupos de investigacion consolidables 2019 project [AICO/2019/214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of the pre-ozonization on the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs) upon chlorination for fresh waters containing three common cyanobacteria, namely Microcystis aeruginosa, Anabaena aequalis and Oscillatoria tenuis at 10,000 cells/mL is reported. Specifically, the formation carbonaceous-DBPs (C-DBPs) (trihalomethanes (THMs), haloacetic acids (HAAs) and haloketones (HKs)) and nitrogenous-DBPs (N-DBP) (haloacetonitriles (HAN) and trichloronitromethane (TCNM)) has been determined as a function of the pH (6.5 or 8.0 and bromide ion concentration (300 mu g/L). The main C-DBPs were THMs and HAAs with negligible formation of HKs accompanied by minor amounts of HANs in the absence of TCNM. Pre-ozonation of the aqueous cyanobacteria suspensions does not allow a control over all the DBPs. In fact, pre-ozonation increases THM formation and generates TCNM, has low influence on HAAs and only decreases the formation of HANs. The overall conclusion of this work is that preozonation of waters containing a relatively low concentration of common fresh water cyanobacteria is not an appropriate process to decrease DBP formation from chlorine. Cyanobacteria removal from raw water before chlorination or ozonation should reduce DBP formation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据