4.1 Article

Biochemical effects of mutations in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2B associated with Vanishing White Matter disease

期刊

BMC MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12881-015-0204-z

关键词

CACH; Leukodystrophy; eIF2B; EIF2B1; VWM

资金

  1. UK Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J007706/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J007706/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/J007706/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Leukoencephalopathy with Vanishing White Matter (VWM) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by germline mutations in the genes EIF2B1-5, which encode the 5 subunits of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF2B. To date, analysis of the biochemical effects of mutations in the EIF2B2-5 genes has been carried out, but no study has been performed on mutations in the EIF2B1 gene. This gene encodes eIF2Ba, the smallest subunit in eIF2B which has an important role in both the structure and regulation of the eIF2B complex. Methods: eIF2B subunits were overexpressed in HEK293 cells and isolated from the resulting cell lysates by affinity chromatography. Formation of the eIF2B complex and binding of its substrate, eIF2, was assessed by western blot. Assays of the guanine nucleotide exchange (GEF) activity were also carried out. Results: Of the 5 eIF2B alpha mutations studied, we found 3 that showed loss or reduction of binding of eIF2B alpha to the rest of the complex, one with increased GEF activity, and one where no effects on activity or complex formation were observed. Conclusions: This is the first study on eIF2B alpha VWM mutations. We show that some mutations cause expected decreases in GEF activity or complex formation, similar to a majority of observed VWM mutations. However, we also observe some unexpected changes which hint at other effects of these mutations on as yet undescribed functions of eIF2B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据