4.7 Article

Effect of rotational speed on the interfacial nano-structural evolution and friction behavior of hydrogenated fullerene-like carbon (FLC) films in vacuum

期刊

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106746

关键词

Fullerene-like carbon film; Friction mechanism; Interfacial nano-structure evolution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51905326, 52075309]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China [2019JQ-450, 2019JQ-053]
  3. Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology, China [SKLTKF19A02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the friction coefficient of H-FLC film is negatively correlated with rotational speed, reaching ultra-low friction at 500 rpm. Detailed nano structure evolution research indicates that the odd carbon ring fraction at the sliding interface is the key to H-FLC's low friction, with rearranged pentagonal and heptagonal carbon rings enhancing the fullerene-like carbon content. This work corroborated the significant role of rehybridization at the frictional interface in achieving ultra-low friction of H-FLC.
Hydrogenated fullerene-like carbon (H-FLC) film is of great potential in reaching macro-scale ultra-low friction. But its friction regime is still under debate. In this study, friction behavior of H-FLC was investigated in vacuum and ambient under various rotational speeds. Results show that friction coefficient is in negative correlation with rotational speed. At rotational speed of 500 rpm, H-FLC film reached ultra-low friction (0.015). Detailed nano structure evolution research indicates that the odd carbon ring fraction at sliding interface is the origin of H-FLC's low friction. Namely, randomly oriented pentagonal and heptagonal carbon rings were rearranged in wear track, which enhanced the FL content. This work corroborated that rehybridization at frictional interface of H-FLC plays an important role in its ultra-low friction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据