4.7 Review

A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102436

关键词

Electric vehicle adoption; Meta-analysis; Road transport; Air pollution; Zero emission vehicle

资金

  1. Himachal Pradesh Technical University (HPTU) Hamirpur under Collaborative Research Project of Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP-III)
  2. HPTU Hamirpur, State Project Implementation Unit Himachal, Himachal Institute of Engineering & Technology Shahpur
  3. Career Point University Hamirpur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deployment of electric vehicles (EVs) may mitigate major issues such as environmental pollution and dependence on oil. However, the current market penetration of EV is still at the nascent stage despite many governments employing dynamic advertising policies. This paper empirically investigates the factors influencing a consumer's intention to adopt an EV. A total of 211 peer-reviewed research articles published between 2009 and 2019 covering the main categories consumer intentions - adoption intention, purchase intention, behavioural intention, and usage intention, - were selected. This study categorises influential factors, into four main types, namely demographic, situational, contextual, and psychological. A comprehensive overview of the theoretical perspectives was also developed to understand adoption behaviour and a consumer's intentions towards EVs. The findings provide the most common research methodology employed for testing, analysing and comparing the relations among EV factors. A simple meta-analysis shows that the trend of studies on the influencing factors for adopting EVs has increased significantly over the past decade. Finally, this review study has managerial implications and shows future directions for EV researchers and practitioners that may help governments and the automobile industry to increase the usage share of EVs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据