4.8 Article

Priming Spatial Activity by Single-Cell Stimulation in the Dentate Gyrus of Freely Moving Rats

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 536-541

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.053

关键词

-

资金

  1. Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN) at the Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the framework of the Excellence Initiative [EXC 307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An essential requirement for hippocampal circuits to function in episodic memory is the ability to rapidly disambiguate and store incoming sensory information [1]. This pattern separation'' function has been classically associated to the dentate gyrus, where spatial learning is accompanied by rapid and persistent modifications of place-cell representation [2, 3]. How these rapid modifications are implemented at the cellular level has remained largely unresolved. Here, we tested whether plasticity-inducing stimuli-spike trains-evoked in postsynaptic neurons are sufficient for the rapid induction of place-field activity in the dentate gyrus. We juxtacellularly stimulated 67 silent granule cells while rats explored a maze for the first time. Spike trains with different characteristics (e.g., number of spikes, frequency, and theta-rhythmicity) were evoked at randomly selected spatial locations. We found that, under novelty, similar to 30% (10/33) of the stimulated neurons fired selectively at the primed'' spatial location on subsequent laps. Induced place fields were either transient or persisted for multiple laps. The priming'' effect was experience dependent, as it was less frequently observed in habituated animals (3/34 neurons), and it correlated with the number of spikes and theta-rhythmicity of the stimulus trains. These data indicate that, albeit with low efficiency, evoked theta-rhythmic spike trains can be sufficient for priming spatial activity in the dentate gyrus and thus recruiting silent granule cells into the coding population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据