4.5 Article

Frailty syndrome, biomarkers and environmental factors - A pilot study

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 14-22

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.04.023

关键词

Frailty; DNA damage; H2AX phosphorylation; Mercury; Exposure history

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT-MCTES)
  2. European Social Fund, through Programa Operacional Capital Humano (POCH) [SFRH/BD/121802/2016, SFRH/BPD/100948/2014]
  3. Beatriz Galindo Research Fellowship [BEAGAL18/00142]
  4. COST Action The comet assay as a human biomonitoring tool (hCOMET) [CA15132]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/121802/2016] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frailty is an age-related syndrome expected to increase over the next decades. This syndrome has been identified to be the most common condition leading to disability, institutionalisation and death in the elderly. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate a possible link between frailty status, biomarkers and environmental exposures. A group of 71 older adults (>= 65 years old) was engaged in this study. The study population was classified as 45.1% robust, 45.1% pre-frail and 9.8% frail. A significant higher prevalence of second-hand smokers was found in the pre-frail group when compared to robust. Furthermore, a higher prevalence of robust individuals was found among those consuming home-produced vegetables and water from well/springs. Significant differences were found between data collected in a lifetime exposure questionnaire (LTEQ) and the levels of genotoxicity endpoints and the mercury levels analysed regarding some exposure-related parameters, namely, smoking habits, intake of home-produced vegetables and the use of pesticides in agriculture. Understanding if the way we live(d) or worked can impact the way we age are important questions to be explored. Data obtained in this pilot study encourage further studies on this matter, exploring the role of exposures history and its impact on health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据