4.7 Article

Design and fabrication of a highly sensitive and naked-eye distinguishable colorimetric biosensor for chloramphenicol detection by using ELISA on nanofibrous membranes

期刊

TALANTA
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121054

关键词

Enzyme-linked immunoassay; Nanofibrous membrane; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Chloramphenicol; Naked-eye distinction; Colorimetric sensor

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, United States (USDA-NIFA) [2018-67017-28116]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Services (NIEHS), United States (University of california, Davis Superfund) [5P42ES004699-30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) is highly specific and selective towards target molecules and is convenient for on-site detection. However, in many cases, lack of high sensitivity makes it hard to reveal a significant colorimetric signal for detecting a trace amount of target molecules. Thus, analytical instruments are required for detection, which limits the application of ELISA for on-site detection. In the present study, a highly sensitive and naked-eyed detectable colorimetric biosensor for chloramphenicol (CAP) was prepared by incorporating ELISA onto surfaces of microporous and nanofibrous membranes. The high specific surface areas of the nanofibers significantly increased the number of antibodies covalently linked onto the fiber surfaces and binding capacity of the sensor with antigens present in a sample. With such an integration, the sensitivity of the ELISA sensor was dramatically increased, and a trace number of targets could reveal a naked-eye detectable color. The immunoassay sensor exhibited a significant naked-eye distinguishable color to chloramphenicol (CAP) at 0.3 ng/mL. The successful design and fabrication of the nanofibrous membrane immunoassay sensor provide new paths towards the development of on-site inspection sensors without the assistance from any instrument.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据