4.4 Article

Lithium-silica nanosalt as a low-temperature electrolyte additive for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 611-617

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2016.03.012

关键词

Lithium-modified nanosalt; Fumed silica; Electrolyte additive; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Education [2013R1A1A2061288]
  2. Technology Development Program for Strategic Core Materials - Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy [10047758]
  3. R&D Convergence Program of NST (National Council of Science & Technology) of Republic of Korea [14-2-KITECH]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2061288] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lithium-modified silica nanosalt (Li-SiO2, coded Li202) of hydrophobic fumed silica (R202) is synthesized to use as an electrolyte additive for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) under low temperature conditions. The synthesis method consists of reacting the silica nanoparticles with LiH and consequently quickly reacting the conjugate silicate ions with 1,3-propanesultone as a surface stabilizer. The obtained Li202 nanosalt (2.5 wt%) is added into an electrolyte solution of 1.0 M LiPF6 dissolved in ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate/ethylmethyl carbonate/diethyl carbonate (20:5:55:20 vol%) + 2 wt% vinylene carbonate. The electrolyte solution including the Li202 nanosalt shows higher ionic conductivity and superior electrochemical stability over 5 V, which is due to the stabilized surface group. The high-rate capability at -20 degrees C of the LiCoO2/graphite cell is particularly enhanced by adding Li202 nanosalt. In addition, excellent cycle performance at -20 degrees C endorses the use of Li202 nanosalt as a low-temperature electrolyte additive for LIBs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据