4.7 Article

A Drug Sweeping'' State of the TriABC Triclosan Efflux Pump from Pseudomonas aeruginosa

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 261-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.09.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI052293]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2014-04798, RGPIN-2016-04898]
  3. University of Melbourne STMM Funds
  4. GEPROM-FRQS
  5. Canadian government through Genome Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure of the inner membrane component TriABC and its substrate-free conformation were determined by cryoelectron microscopy, revealing an intermediate step in efflux complex assembly and identifying a tunnel network with constriction that impedes substrate efflux. Functional analyses were used to propose that selective substrate translocation involves conformational gating at the tunnel narrowing.
The structure of the TriABC inner membrane component of the triclosan/SDS-specific efflux pump from Pseudomonas aeruginosa was determined by cryoelectron microscopy to 4.5 angstrom resolution. The complete structure of the inner membrane transporter TriC of the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) superfamily was solved, including a partial structure of the fused periplasmic membrane fusion subunits, TriA and TriB. The substrate-free conformation of TriABC represents an intermediate step in efflux complex assembly before the engagement of the outer membrane channel. Structural analysis identified a tunnel network whose constriction impedes substrate efflux, indicating inhibition of TriABC in the unengaged state. Blind docking studies revealed binding to TriC at the same loci by substrates and bulkier non-substrates. Together with functional analyses, we propose that selective substrate translocation involves conformational gating at the tunnel narrowing that, together with conformational ordering of TriA and TriB, creates an engaged state capable of mediating substrate efflux.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据