4.7 Article

Label-free and enzyme-free one-step rapid colorimetric detection of DNA methylation based on unmodified gold nanoparticles

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118375

关键词

DNA methylation; Bisulfite conversion; Au nanoparticles; UV absorption; Colorimetric analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21605075, 21365015, 31660491, 81102289, 31960207]
  2. Jiangxi Province Natural Science Foundation [20181BAB203020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA methylation has been identified as one of the important causes of tumorigenesis, so it is important to develop some advanced methods for detecting and quantifying DNA methylation. In this study, a label-free and enzyme-free one-step rapid colorimetric detection of DNA methylation based on unmodified Au nanoparticles (Au NPs)has been proposed. This method can quickly, efficiently, economically and easily colorimetric detect methylated DNA only by the color change of unmodified Au NPs solution without the covalent modification of Au NPs in advance or complicated instruments for implementation with practical limitations or expensive biological enzymes or traditional organic dyes during the reaction. The strategy employed the difference in electrostatic attraction of single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA against salt-induced aggregation of Au NPs. The method has a DNA methylated detection limit of 8.47 nM and it is distinctly visible to detect methylated DNA with the naked eye as low as 20 nM. Furthermore, the strategy has an ability to detect methylated DNA in the presence of abundant unmethylated DNA with the detection limit of 0.13% and as low as 1% methylated DNA can be distinguished in heterogeneous samples with the naked eye. Also, the stratagem provides a convenient and rapid platform for methylated DNA detection of human serum samples in one step, which displays a huge potential for clinical diagnosis and treatment of oncological diseases. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据