4.6 Article

A multi-period fuzzy mean-minimax risk portfolio model with investor's risk attitude

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 2949-2963

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-05351-3

关键词

Fuzzy portfolio selection; Risk attitude; l(infinity) downside risk; Diversification constraint; Multiple particle swarm optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501049]
  2. Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [18YJA630132]
  3. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses a multi-period portfolio selection problem considering investor's risk attitude in a fuzzy environment, using fuzzy numbers to represent the return rates of risky assets and an l(infinity) downside risk function to measure the portfolio's risk. The proposed model aims to maximize expected wealth and minimize cumulative risk, with a diversification constraint for risk-free assets, and is solved using a multiple particle swarm optimization method, demonstrating its effectiveness with a real case example.
This paper deals with a multi-period portfolio selection problem considering investor's risk attitude in fuzzy environment. We regard the return rate of each risky asset as a fuzzy number and use the expected value and semi-absolute deviation to measure its return and risk, respectively. We adopt an l(infinity) downside risk function to measure the portfolio's risk, which is represented by the maximum individual risk. Moreover, we formulate a reasonable diversification constraint for the portfolio involving risk-free asset. Then, we propose a multi-period portfolio selection model with the objectives of maximizing the final expected wealth and minimizing the final cumulative risk. Furthermore, we design a multiple particle swarm optimization to solve it. Finally, we illustrate the effectiveness of the model and algorithm by using a real case.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据