4.7 Article

Selective flotation separation of spodumene from feldspar using sodium alginate as an organic depressant

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117122

关键词

Spodumene; Flotation; Feldspar; Sodium alginate; Organic depressant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674207, 51922091]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2018QNRC001]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2019YFS0453, 2018JY0148]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project of the Southwest University of Science and Technology [19ycx0034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium alginate (SA) was investigated for use as a depressant in the spodumene-feldspar system. In this flotation system, the SA is added before the cation collector, dodecylamine (DDA). The effects of SA on mineral floatability were systematically investigated by flotation experiments, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform IR spectroscopy (FTIR), zeta potential measurements, and speciation analysis. Single-mineral flotation results showed that using 30 mg/L SA allowed the separation of spodumene from feldspar at pH 6, although there was a strong pH dependence. Zeta potential measurements and FTIR analysis showed that SA and DDA can adsorb onto both minerals. XPS analysis revealed the adsorption mechanism: the strong affinity of SA for the mineral surface arose from the complexation of SA and Al sites. Analysis of the surface and solution chemistry revealed that SA chelated Al3+ or its hydroxides and hindered the subsequent adsorption of DDA, resulting in a hydrophilic feldspar surface. In addition, there were more aluminium hydroxides and unsaturated O atoms on the spodumene surface than on that of feldspar, and these provided available sites for the adsorption of DDA to form a stable reticular structure with SA, thus improving the floatability of the spodumene at certain pH values. Lastly, a model for SA and DDA adsorption at the water-solid interface is proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据