4.7 Article

Monodispersed wurtzite Cu2SnS3 nanocrystals by phosphine and oleylamine free facile heat-up technique

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 18, 期 16, 页码 2885-2893

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ce00296j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Human Resources Development, Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20124010203180]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2015R1A2A2A01006856]
  3. DST-India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wurtzite Cu2SnS3 (CTS) nanocrystals with an average size 8.5 nm were prepared for the first time by a phosphine and oleylamine free facile one-step thermolysis method. The as-prepared nanocrystals were investigated for structural, morphological and compositional properties. The advantages of the heat-up technique for a swift synthesis of gram scale, phase pure CTS nanocrystals; applicable for various energy devices like solar cell, batteries etc., are discussed. Nanocrystals were synthesized at different reaction times viz. 10, 20 and 30 minutes. The possible growth mechanism for colloidal CTS nanocrystals has been investigated. Herein we observed that CTS nanocrystals growth starts with the formation of copper sulphide nanoparticles, acting as nuclei for the subsequent growth of CTS nanocrystals. X-ray diffraction analysis revealed the formation of phase pure wurtzite CTS nanocrystals which is further supported by high resolution transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. To the best of our knowledge colloidal wurtzite CTS nanocrystals synthesis has been reported with the use of strongly co-ordinating, highly toxic oleylamine (OLA) solvent, herein stepping towards a green synthesis we report for the first time on the synthesis of sub 10 nm wurtzite CTS nanocrystals using neutral, less toxic and less expensive octadecene (ODE) solvent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据