4.5 Article

A Shallow Shock: The 25 February 2019 ML 4.9 Earthquake in the Weiyuan Shale Gas Field in Sichuan, China

期刊

SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 3182-3194

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0220200202

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China under the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)/Research Grants Council (RGC) Joint Research Scheme [N_CUHK430/16, N_CUHK418/15]
  2. RGC-Germany Joint Research Scheme [G-CUHK408/19]
  3. National NSFC [41804015, 41661164035]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1504501-02, 2019YFC1509205]
  5. State Key Lab of Earthquake Dynamics [LED2017B07]
  6. Institute of Geology
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CEA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Earthquakes rarely occur at extremely shallow depths, for example, less than 2 km. Even for induced earthquakes that are typically shallower than tectonic events, only very small ones have been reported in such depths. The M-L 4.9 earthquake (M-w 4.3) that struck the Rongxian County, Sichuan, China on 25 February 2019 was an extremely shallow event. Seismological and geodetic data constrained the mainshock depth at similar to 1 km with a thrust-faulting mechanism, consistent with the Molin fault orienting northwest. Two foreshocks with magnitudes larger than 4 occurred on an unmapped fault striking northeast, right next to an injection well where hydraulic fracturing (HF) was conducted. The focal depths of the two foreshocks were at similar to 2.7 km, coinciding with the depth of HF. Coulomb failure stresses of the two foreshocks on the Molin fault was similar to 3 kPa, smaller than typical static triggering threshold (10 kPa), and thus their triggering effects were mild. As the fault was hydraulically sealed from HF, we suggested that the M-L 4.9 earthquake was possibly triggered by nearby HF activities through poroelastic stress transfer. Such findings held significant implications for shale gas development by considering seismic hazard associated with shallow faults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据